KAY discloses that he was actually nearby at McGill studying Engineering at the same time - and he or his colleagues (male & female) never considered it a "female" tragedy. Despite my distance from the event at the time, it was exactly my feelings as well. He concludes:
Lépine was a one-off, mentally disturbed child-abuse victim and social reject who conjured bizarre conspiracy theories about women he'd never met — in the same evil way that Virginia Tech gunman Seung-Hui Cho said he hated "rich kids" and "charlatans." To connect his views to the prejudices and allegedly misogynistic policies of society-at-large is absurd. Yet every December 6, this is exactly what many commentators do.
This event is beginning to generate more adverse press every year and I think it is starting to be self-defeating propaganda. How is it that changes in treatment have not adopted new, more effective protocols? They are being held back by the feminist intellectual ghetto.
Note the comments collected by ZERBASIAS throughout the year and presented - out of context and representative of angry out control men. It is evidence that there is NO POINT in sending flaming emails to her when she makes inflammatory comments.
Note the comments collected by ZERBASIAS throughout the year and presented - out of context and representative of angry out control men. It is evidence that there is NO POINT in sending flaming emails to her when she makes inflammatory comments.
